Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 24 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b358
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b358
Risk is not increased, but some health questions remain
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The experimental studies of the effects of chemical warfare agents conducted on thousands of British military personnel over several decades at the Porton Down facility in the United Kingdom have been an ongoing source of controversy regarding the scientific, ethical, and moral environment in which they took place.1 Concerns about effects on health increased following a coroners finding in 2004 of unlawful killing regarding the death of a Porton Down subject in 1953 after cutaneous administration of a chemical warfare nerve agent in a non-therapeutic experiment. This finding understandably raised important questions about the longer term health of the 18 000 British veterans who took part in the Porton Down experiments.2 To investigate this, two linked studies have assessed whether the risks of cancer or mortality are higher in veterans who took part in tests compared with those who did not.3 4
Established in 1916 in response to the use of
Malcolm R Sim, director, Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health
1 School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
malcolm.sim@med.monash.edu.au