Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 24 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1129
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1129
Must be reduced for the overall carbon reduction strategy to succeed
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In the linked analysis article (doi:10.1136/bmj.b609), Hutchins and White describe an audit of anaesthetic waste collected from six theatres in one teaching hospital in the United Kingdom and identify potential improvements in the management of such waste.1 Around 540 kg of solid anaesthetic waste was produced (about 2300 kg per theatre per year), 40% of which was potentially recyclable paper, card, plastic, and glass. Analysis of five sharps bins found that only 4% by weight was true sharps waste (needles and broken glass)—57% was glass and 39% was "other" (packaging, plastic, metal, and fluid).
Last years World Health Assembly adopted a powerful resolution on climate change, which not only warned of the stark consequences for human health but also identified how the health sector should respond to the profound changes taking place in the global ecosystem.2 The direct contribution of the health sector to environmental degradation is however
Gabriel Scally, regional director of public health
1 South West Strategic Health Authority, Taunton, Somerset TA1 2PX
gabriel.scally@southwest.nhs.uk