Published 23 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1196
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1196

Letters

"Public-researcher partnership"

Realities in accessing records

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

As a paediatrician, I agree that current trends in regulation risk impeding or even preventing important research that patients and their parents want done.1 People who have (or whose children have) experienced acute and chronic illnesses usually enthusiastically support (appropriately vetted, good quality) research and, indeed, often donate generously to the charities that fund much of the best UK research. If you ask them whether they want protection from the intrusion of their (or their child’s) records being screened for eligibility for a study, the stock response is: "Don’t be daft, get on with it!"

In addition, clinical research nurses who identify suitable potential subjects for studies are generally recruited, or on secondment, from the clinical teams that manage the children they are screening. They have contracts with the same NHS trusts and are bound by the same codes of professional conduct as the staff delivering day to day care. . . . [Full text of this article]

Adam Finn, David Baum professor of paediatrics1

1 University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8AE

adam.finn@bristol.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Charities call for "public-researcher partnership" in sharing electronic patient data
Lizy Cooper
BMJ 2009 338: b856. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ