Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 23 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1196
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1196
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
As a paediatrician, I agree that current trends in regulation risk impeding or even preventing important research that patients and their parents want done.1 People who have (or whose children have) experienced acute and chronic illnesses usually enthusiastically support (appropriately vetted, good quality) research and, indeed, often donate generously to the charities that fund much of the best UK research. If you ask them whether they want protection from the intrusion of their (or their childs) records being screened for eligibility for a study, the stock response is: "Dont be daft, get on with it!"
In addition, clinical research nurses who identify suitable potential subjects for studies are generally recruited, or on secondment, from the clinical teams that manage the children they are screening. They have contracts with the same NHS trusts and are bound by the same codes of professional conduct as the staff delivering day to day care.
Adam Finn, David Baum professor of paediatrics1
1 University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8AE
adam.finn@bristol.ac.uk