Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 18 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1098
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1098
Robert Bud, principal curator of medicine, Science Museum, London
r.bud@ntlworld.com
An account of the lack of evidence behind many of the renowned discoveries of medical science, and indeed for their effectiveness, is reviewed by Robert Bud
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
This sceptical history of medicine and drugs is both serious in intent and entertaining in delivery. It is also provocative, unbalanced in its choice of examples, and occasionally inaccurate. The serious message is lurking throughout but is only expressed near the end: "The moral is not that doctors once did foolish things. The moral is that even the best of people let themselves down when they rely on untested theories, and that these failures kill people and stain history."
Most of the rest of the book is made up of well told stories chosen to persuade the reader of the truth of this conclusion. These stories are best read as a myth cycle—not in the sense of myth as untruth but as interpretations of often well known events, with meaning and a moral for the present. The message that many drugs have been used without evidence is an important one.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?