Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 18 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1090
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1090
Tessa Richards, assistant editor, BMJ
trichards@bmj.com
As the influence of EU law on health care grows, so does the case for playing an active part in shaping it
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Few doctors need reminding of the impact of European Union law. Hospitals throughout the United Kingdom are struggling to devise rotas that meet the stringent requirements of the "48 hour" EU Working Time Directive, while debate continues on the wisdom of complying with it (BMJ 2008;337:a942, doi:10.1136/bmj.39541.443611.80).
How times have changed. In the decade after the UKs entry to the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1973 many junior doctors worked a 100 hour week. The idea that law originating in the European Commissions employment rights programme might reduce this number never entered our heads. Or that legislation rolled out to create a single European market for goods, services, capital, and people would (language skills permitting) give us the opportunity to ply our trade across national borders.
If we had the energy to think about "Brussels" at all, the tendency was to mock its Kafkaesque institutions peopled by
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses