Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 17 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1071
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1071
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Norton and colleagues refer to the opportunity costs of endoscopic procedures performed by doctors and consider whether their time could be more effectively spent elsewhere.1
Of course, you might ask the same question about whether valuable clinical nurses are best used as endoscopists. Acquiring the manual skills to perform these procedures is quite straightforward. Indeed, the recent pilot study by the UK Department of Health confirmed that administrators, healthcare assistants, phlebotomists, and clinical physiologists can all be successfully trained to become endoscopy "practitioners."2 The opportunity costs of these workers may be even lower than those of nurses.
For a well defined, large volume screening test such as flexible sigmoidoscopy in symptomless patients this may be a reasonable, perhaps even cost effective, approach. However, evaluating patients with gastrointestinal disorders requires more than practical dexterity. It relies on a physicians ability to interpret symptoms and signs and understand the natural history of
Richard J Aspinall, consultant physician1
1 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XN
richard.aspinall@cardiffandvale.wales.nhs.uk