Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 17 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1067
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1067
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The tenet that immediate breast reconstruction improves health related quality of life underlines the increasing practice of breast reconstruction internationally.1 2 However, there is no good clinical evidence to support this. A systematic review of relevant journals showed a lack of level I evidence—2% randomised controlled trials, 15% cohort studies, and 80% case reports—and a threshold of methodological rigour of levels IV and V.3
Systematic review of whether breast reconstruction improves health related quality of life for women facing mastectomy did not show an improvement in all domains.4 Two single centre randomised controlled trials showed no difference between immediate and delayed breast reconstruction and between types of delayed breast reconstruction regardless of radiotherapy.4 The nine prospective longitudinal cohort studies and the 23 retrospective cross sectional studies showed inconsistent results.4
Heightened awareness is needed to produce the highest levels of scientific evidence to inform the correct choice for patients and clinicians. To
Zoë Ellen Winters, consultant senior lecturer in breast surgery and head1
1 Breast Reconstruction HRQL Group, Clinical Sciences South Bristol, University Hospitals of Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS2 8HW
Zoe.winters@bristol.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses