Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 12 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b659
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b659
Brian Buckley, Cochrane research fellow1, Adrian M Grant, professor of health services research2
1 Department of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, 2 Institute of Applied Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD
Correspondence to: B Buckley bsbuckley@iol.ie
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Neural damage from injury to the spinal cord or neurological conditions, such as multiple sclerosis or spina bifida, may cause neurogenic bladder dysfunction; this affects the ability to retain or to void urine, or both. Considerable uncertainty exists regarding the most effective management of neurogenic bladder dysfunction, which aims to prevent urinary tract infection and preserve upper urinary tract health, continence, and quality of life.1 2 The effect of incontinence on quality of life can hardly be overestimated.3
Management is usually long term, complex, and determined by the underlying neurological abnormality. It is often guided by urodynamic evaluation of lower urinary tract function. The patients preferences and availability of help from carers also affect management choices and must be carefully assessed.
Management options depend on the patients characteristics but include indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheterisation; intermittent catheterisation; urine collection by an external device; sacral nerve stimulation; and surgical techniques such as
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses