Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 10 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b609
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b609
David C J Hutchins, medical student, Stuart M White, consultant in anaesthesia
1 Brighton Anaesthesia Research Forum, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, East Sussex BN2 5BE
Correspondence to: S M White stuart.white@bsuh.nhs.uk
Increasing numbers of people are trying to reduce and recycle their domestic waste, but hospitals have been slower to get the message. David Hutchins and Stuart White look at the potential environmental and financial benefits
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Both the UK government and the British Medical Association have recently published strategies for "greener" health care.1 2 An audit of anaesthetic waste at our hospital found that about 40% of all waste (roughly 950 kg/theatre/year) was potentially recyclable paper, card, plastic, and glass, and only 4% by weight of sharps bin contents was true sharp waste. Although recycling has potential environmental and financial benefits, it is hampered by convenience, technology, lack of knowledge, concerns about environmental safety, and statutory regulation. We discuss how clinicians might cut the amount of waste they produce by reducing, reusing, and recycling resources and suggest ideas for future research.
The NHS produced 408 218 tonnes of waste in 2005-6, 29% of which was clinical waste, and spent nearly £73m (
80m; $103m) on its disposal. This is equivalent to 5.5 kg of waste per patient per day. By comparison, France and Germany, which historically have
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses