Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 3 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b357
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b357
Routine collection of more detailed data is key to improving knowledge
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Maternal health is important because it sets the scene, not only for survival and subsequent health of the infant, but also for the woman herself. The traditional measurement of maternal health is the maternal mortality ratio. Gross inequalities exist in the maternal mortality ratio between developed and developing countries, and the gap is not closing. The maternal mortality ratio in developed countries is about nine in 100 000 births; in sub-Saharan Africa maternal death is over 100 times more common, and the context is different from that seen in developed countries.1
In the linked study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b542), Knight and colleagues use the United Kingdom obstetric surveillance system (UKOSS) to assess another aspect of maternal health—severe maternal morbidity. The study shows that severe maternal morbidity is significantly more common in non-white women than in white women in the UK, particularly those in black African and Caribbean ethnic groups. It also
Wendy Pollock, honorary fellow1, James F King, associate professor2
1 School of Nursing and Social Work, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia, 2 Perinatal Medicine, Royal Womens Hospital, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
pollockw@unimelb.edu.au
Read all Rapid Responses