Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 3 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b861
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b861
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The potential cost of more rapid access to services should not be overlooked.1
Queueing models show how rapidly costs rise with the shortening of the queue. To see a dermatologist in two days means having a lot more dermatologists who either cost more or get paid less. Either way they have to be less busy to make sure there will always be free slots at short notice. In addition, the result of greater convenience for all would mean many more people working unsocial hours, or less convenience for many.
Part of the issue here is that the patient is depicted as a high powered executive whose work is so important that only a cancer scare can displace it.1 How many of us really begrudge our colleagues, our postman, our builder time off to go to see a doctor? Perhaps we also need to put the importance of work in proportion
Peter A West, senior research associate1
1 York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York YO10 5NH
paw11@york.ac.uk