Published 29 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2619
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2619

Letters

Celibacy of Catholic priests

Points of information

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Sexual abuse by clergy was condemned by the Council of Elvira in 306 (the first recorded case of such a condemnation), but this was over 700 years before mandatory clerical celibacy. This rather undermines Delamothe’s argument about priestly celibacy1: sexual abuse of young people by those in authority has been around for a long time, well before any requirement to be celibate.

Sexual abuse by other groups—other religious leaders from denominations where celibacy is not a requirement, teachers, social workers, health professionals—all show a breach of trust and predatory behaviour. Yet in each of these, again, celibacy would seem to be a red herring.

I realise the title of the piece was a reference to St Paul’s injunction, but if Delamothe is seriously advocating marriage as an antidote, this may be missing the target: 90% of the sexual abuse reported was by male perpetrators on pubescent and teenage boys. . . . [Full text of this article]

Paul W Keeley, consultant palliative physician1

1 Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF

Paul.Keeley@ggc.scot.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Catholic priests: it is better to marry than to burn (and beat up)
Tony Delamothe
BMJ 2009 338: b2142. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ