Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 29 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2619
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2619
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Sexual abuse by clergy was condemned by the Council of Elvira in 306 (the first recorded case of such a condemnation), but this was over 700 years before mandatory clerical celibacy. This rather undermines Delamothes argument about priestly celibacy1: sexual abuse of young people by those in authority has been around for a long time, well before any requirement to be celibate.
Sexual abuse by other groups—other religious leaders from denominations where celibacy is not a requirement, teachers, social workers, health professionals—all show a breach of trust and predatory behaviour. Yet in each of these, again, celibacy would seem to be a red herring.
I realise the title of the piece was a reference to St Pauls injunction, but if Delamothe is seriously advocating marriage as an antidote, this may be missing the target: 90% of the sexual abuse reported was by male perpetrators on pubescent and teenage boys.
Paul W Keeley, consultant palliative physician1
1 Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF
Paul.Keeley@ggc.scot.nhs.uk