Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 29 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2615
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2615
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Erythromycin is no longer considered the first choice in contact prophylaxis for whooping cough.1 According to a Cochrane review,2 the best regimens for microbiological clearance and for contact prophylaxis, with fewer side effects, are azithromycin (10 mg/kg as a single dose for three days or 10 mg/kg on the
rst day and 5 mg/kg once daily for four days) or clarithromycin (7.5 mg/kg twice daily for seven days). The 2002 UK guidelines cited by Harnden advised against using newer macrolides since they were not licensed,3 but these drugs are now included in the 2008 BNF for children for preventing secondary cases of pertussis in non-immune or partially immune patients. Moreover, infants exposed to erythromycin (but not other macrolides) are at greater risk of developing hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.4
Although the polymerase chain reaction is not a basic test, it may be decisive and quick in determining when serology is not useful,
Gianluca Tornese, resident in paediatrics1, Federica Patarino, resident in paediatrics1, Federico Marchetti, consultant paediatrician1
1 Department of Paediatrics, Institute of Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, and University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
gianluca.tornese@gmail.com