Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 29 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2585
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2585
Laurent Degos, chair of board, René Amalberti, senior adviser (patient safety), Jean Bacou, head of international affairs, Jean Carlet, medical director, Charles Bruneau, senior adviser (accreditation)
1 Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), 2 avenue du Stade de France, 93218 Saint-Denis La Plaine Cedex, France
Correspondence to: R Amalberti r.amalberti@has-sante.fr
To achieve real improvements in patient safety we need to look at the whole of patients care not just specific procedures, argue Laurent Degos and colleagues
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Patient safety currently revolves around hospital inpatients and has two approaches: adoption of well structured, standardised, evidence based treatment and a safe culture system (reporting, cooperation, etc) with checks and safeguards to reduce the occurrence of medical errors and adverse events. The aim is to avoid and prevent adverse events or injury through health care and to improve overall care.1 However, despite these interventions, almost 10% of hospital patients experience an adverse event and about 40% of events are preventable.2 3
These high rates would doubtless be higher if out of hospital risks were included. We believe that the best way to reduce in-hospital risks is to start by reducing out of hospital risks that result in hospital admission. We argue that the current scope of patient safety is too restricted and should be extended to cover all obstacles to timely access to appropriate care.
Current safety interventions are evaluated using
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses