Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 25 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2561
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2561
Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
fgodlee@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
It would be fair to say that the BMJ tends towards less rather than more medicine. Weve published a lot over the years on the risks of overtreatment and the problems of medicalisation. Its not a bad default to have in times of economic hardship, although I hope we also do our bit to highlight evidence of undertreatment where it exists. In a recent letter David Oliver warned that, although ageing should not be routinely medicalised, there is a risk of "socialising" treatable problems in older people such as incontinence and falls (BMJ 2009;338:b1200).
With that proviso, Im drawn to several articles this week that champion the view that less is more, and in particular that if you give patients complete and unbiased information about the likely effects of an intervention they may well say no to it. Iona Heath sets us off on this tack, writing about her
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses