Published 23 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2514
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2514

Letters

Whistleblowing

Whistleblowing is crucial for a "world class" NHS

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

People’s willingness to highlight justifiable concerns is predicated on their working in a safe, sound, and supportive context.1 The term whistleblowing implies that such a function is special or exceptional. It should be a systemic and systematic part of any organisation’s gathering of feedback intelligence informing it how well it is doing. It seems perverse that the NHS, a "learning organisation", is not regularly considering all available experiences and feedback to inform and optimise its functions.

The message from many who have worked with doctors who have blown their cover and any whistle and then lost their jobs and careers in the NHS is: "Don’t do it"—at least alone. The rhetoric and the policies are full of worthy words, but many doctors have mortgages and families to educate, as well as any duty of care to the public and those they manage, employ, or treat.

The best way to ensure . . . [Full text of this article]

Christopher L Manning, director1

1 UPstream Healthcare, Teddington TW11 9HG

chris.manning@upstreamhealthcare.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Changing the face of whistleblowing
Peter Gooderham
BMJ 2009 338: b2090. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ