Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 23 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2514
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2514
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Peoples willingness to highlight justifiable concerns is predicated on their working in a safe, sound, and supportive context.1 The term whistleblowing implies that such a function is special or exceptional. It should be a systemic and systematic part of any organisations gathering of feedback intelligence informing it how well it is doing. It seems perverse that the NHS, a "learning organisation", is not regularly considering all available experiences and feedback to inform and optimise its functions.
The message from many who have worked with doctors who have blown their cover and any whistle and then lost their jobs and careers in the NHS is: "Dont do it"—at least alone. The rhetoric and the policies are full of worthy words, but many doctors have mortgages and families to educate, as well as any duty of care to the public and those they manage, employ, or treat.
The best way to ensure
Christopher L Manning, director1
1 UPstream Healthcare, Teddington TW11 9HG
chris.manning@upstreamhealthcare.org