Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 15 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2160
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2160
Rights to health care should be balanced with duties to share information for reasonable purposes
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
It is hardly contentious to say that there is a sea change taking place in the way health information is managed in the NHS. The governments vision—if not its practice—is clear: the power of information technology will be fully unleashed to support the provision of 21st century health care (www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk). The flow of high quality, up to date information, accessible to patients and immediately available to appropriate health professionals, will create a virtuous circle: clinicians will be able to do a better job, and patient outcomes will improve. The world being what it is, the governments plans have not met with unanimous applause. Setting to one side the public sector procurement nightmares, the widespread fear of the unknown, and unease about the uses to which big government will put the data, the changes have nevertheless given new energy to a long running debate: who should have control of
Julian Sheather, deputy head of ethics
1 Medical Ethics Department, British Medical Association, BMA House, London WC1H 9JR
jsheather@bma.org.uk
Read all Rapid Responses