Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 15 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1878
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1878
Susanna C Almond, academic clinical fellow in general practice, Nick Summerton, clinical consultant
1 Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF
Correspondence to: S C Almond susanna.almond@doctors.org.uk
The test of time is not appropriate when "red flag" symptoms warrant immediate referral, but it can be helpful in patients presenting with common problems, such as diarrhoea (doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1877), that have a known clinical course
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Patients often present to general practitioners with symptoms or signs that are ill defined and evolving, making it difficult to slot them neatly into a diagnostic category. In a cohort study of 500 patients presenting with common symptoms, 70% had improved at two weeks follow-up, and 60% of the remainder had improved at three months.1 Making a precise diagnosis of all presenting problems is arguably not only unnecessary but also potentially damaging both to the patient and to the overall healthcare budget.2
General practice presents a good opportunity for using the test of time for diagnosis since arranging reassessment is relatively easy. Gray says that the general practice consultation should be seen as a total of 47 minutes spread over the course of a year, rather than a discrete 10 minute entity, allowing repeated evaluation in situations of diagnostic uncertainty.3
Diagnosis by test of time involves a careful initial assessment
Cough
Sore throat
Conjunctivitis
Diarrhoea
Back pain
Knee complaint
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses