Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 15 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1877
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1877
Roger Jones, Wolfson professor of general practice1, Greg Rubin, professor of general practice and primary care2
1 Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Kings College London School of Medicine, London SE11 6SP, 2 Wolfson Research Institute, School of Medicine and Health, University of Durham
Correspondence to: R Jones roger.jones@kcl.ac.uk
A common condition provides an example of the use of the test of time in diagnosis, explained in the accompanying article by Susanna Almond and Nick Summerton (doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1878)
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A 47 year old man consults because he has had diarrhoea for the past 10 days. Three weeks ago he travelled to Bangkok for an academic convention. He now has occasional cramping abdominal pain and feels generally off colour; he has not lost weight and has not noticed blood or mucus in his stools. He has taken loperamide for the past few days, without much benefit.
The diagnostic dilemma is to distinguish between diarrhoea due to short term, probably infective, causes and diarrhoea that represents an early symptom of a more serious gastrointestinal disorder. Acute diarrhoea is somewhat arbitrarily defined as diarrhoea for less than four weeks.1 It is said to affect almost every adult in the United Kingdom every year,2 though most people do not consult a doctor about it.3 4 Viruses are the most common infectious cause in the community, and Campylobacter (12%) and rotavirus (8%) are the organisms
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses