Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 11 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2210
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2210
A need to balance risks, benefits, and choice
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A commitment to quality and safety, together with choice and continuity of care, underpins current directions for the reform of maternity services in the United Kingdom and Australia.1 2 Recognition that midwifery-led care will be central to these changes, with options for women to give birth at home, has stimulated research about the safest and most effective models of care. Symon and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.b2060) compare clinical outcomes between pregnant women accessing an independent midwife and women using the National Health Service (NHS).3 They found that obstetric risk factors were an important predictor of perinatal outcomes. Unwittingly the authors illustrate pitfalls involved in attempting to match disparate datasets. Nevertheless, they confirm some of what we already know about the benefits of continuity models of midwifery care and the important role of risk selection in achieving good perinatal outcomes.
Symon and colleagues attempted to match two groups of women, which is
Allison Shorten, senior lecturer1, Brett Shorten, statistical consultant2
1 School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia 2522, 2 Informed Health Choices Trust, NSW, Australia
ashorten@uow.edu.au
Read all Rapid Responses