Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 28 January 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b293
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b293
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The findings of Fowler and Christakis, that happiness seems to spread through social networks, arise from an innovative use of the data of the Framingham Heart Study.1 However, the question still remains to what extent apparent contagion of happiness to second degrees of separation could in fact be accounted for by people not included in the Framingham study.
The original cohort consisted of only two thirds of the people of the town between the ages of 30 and 62.2 Thus there will be a sizeable number of socially influential people not included in the social network whose impact may be being mistaken for the impact of people at a second degree of separation.
There are enough data in the Framingham Heart Study to control for this effect. By only analysing those who do not refer to friends outside the studys participants, we could look at a smaller but more complete
Jonathan A Mellon, student1
1 St Annes College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6HS
jonathan.mellon@st-annes.ox.ac.uk