Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 27 January 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2760
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a2760
Interpreting the effects of sham acupuncture holds the answer
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In the linked systematic review (doi:10.1136/bmj.a3115), Madsen and colleagues assess the analgesic effect of acupuncture and "placebo acupuncture" compared with usual care in 13 three arm studies.1 Acupuncture has been used virtually unchanged for about 2000 years, although in contemporary practice needles are often stimulated electrically (electroacupuncture). Traditional concepts of the mode of action have not been scientifically substantiated. Acupuncture is currently explained by neurophysiological mechanisms that are well established in research into experimental pain,2 although the precise mechanisms of effects seen in clinical practice are more elusive.
The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of acupuncture versus conventional treatment for chronic pain have been confirmed in large trials over the past 10 years. In particular, Germanys Modellvorhaben Akupunktur (health insurance funded trials on acupuncture) provide evidence of effectiveness that has led to the integration of acupuncture into the management of osteoarthritis of the knee3 and back pain.4 In
Adrian White, clinical research fellow1, Mike Cummings, medical director2
1 Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Plymouth PL6 8BU, 2 British Medical Acupuncture Society, Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, London WC1N
adrian.white@pms.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses