Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 16 January 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.a3021
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a3021
John D Kelly, senior lecturer1, Derek P Fawcett, consultant urologist2, Lawrence C Goldberg, consultant nephrologist3
1 Department of Oncology, Cambridge University, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, 2 Harold Hopkins Department of Urology, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading RG1 5AN, 3 Sussex Kidney Unit, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton BN2 5BE
Correspondence to: J D Kelly jk334@cam.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
|
Many clinicians are not sure what constitutes clinically relevant haematuria; they are also unsure about when patients with haematuria should be referred for specialist assessment and whether they should be referred to a urologist, nephrologist, or both.
In 2006 the National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) commissioned a systematic review of the evidence for the
Transient
Spurious
Urological causes
Nephrological causes
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses