Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 15 January 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b136
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b136
Fiona Godlee, editor, BMJ
fgodlee@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Alex Jadad and Laura OGradys call for a debate on the definition of health has stimulated fascinating responses to both their editorial (doi:10.1136/bmj.a2900) and their blog (http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2008/12/10/alex-jadad-on-defining-health). I particularly like Richard Smiths response to the blog, in which he suggests that health is "the capacity to do what matters most to you" (http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/01/05/richard-smith-can-poetry-define-health).
Two other responses appear in this weeks Letters. Peter Mansfield recalls the Peckham experiment in London in the 1930s and 1940s, which aimed to investigate the nature of health (doi:10.1136/bmj.b83). An expanded vision of health is unlikely to come from within medicine, he says. "Economic and climatic constraints will force healthy living on us eventually, or we shall perish." Peter Davies calls on us to embrace the wider context of health beyond the absence of disease (doi:10.1136/bmj.b28). "For too long we as a society have allowed politicians
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses