Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 6 January 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b7
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b7
Iona Heath, general practitioner, London
aque22@dsl.pipex.com
Bureaucratic tinkering seems a feeble response to a problem as profound as the killing of children
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In the wake of the horrific abuse and subsequent death of Baby P, the government has again commissioned the undoubtedly well meaning Lord Laming to review arrangements for safeguarding children and has initiated another investigation of procedures, interagency working, and accountability. The familiar mantra suggests that the solution to the age old problem of killing of children can be found in the bureaucratic arrangements of the caring professions. This seems a profound underestimate of the nature of the problem and even begins to evoke the philosopher and poet George Santayanas definition of fanaticism as "redoubling your effort when you have forgotten your aim."
Looking after small children is challenging, and many cohesive couples wonder how single parents begin to cope. Yet the number of parents and other child carers who have come close to harming the children in their care seems to vastly outnumber those who are prepared to admit
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?