Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 6 January 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b33
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b33
Kinesh Patel, junior doctor, London
kinesh_patel@yahoo.co.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Post-take ward rounds are not usually an opportunity to earn some much needed cash, so you can imagine my surprise when the consultant playfully offered me a cash reward to make a diagnosis on a patient with a rare condition.
Why did the consultant bet money against my diagnosis? Because the condition in question was vanishingly rare, and with odds of nearly a million to one he believed (not unreasonably) that his money would be safe. Why did I admit the patient? Because the case struck a chord among my somewhat hazy recollections of the information I learnt for my postgraduate examinations.
Which is why it is so surprising to me that the medical establishment has become complicit in allowing medicine to be dumbed down. The entry criteria to be a medical registrar—according to the ubiquitous person specifications—no longer include a requirement to have passed the Member of the Royal
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses