Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 27 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b11
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b11
Moderate to poor quality evidence shows no benefit on clinically important outcomes
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The treatment of bone fractures in the extremities traditionally includes cast immobilisation or surgery using internal or external fixation devices. Adjunctive non-invasive or extracorporal treatments have also been developed to speed up bone healing in people with fractures or osteotomies. These treatments include electromagnetic stimulation, low intensity pulsed ultrasound, and extracorporal shockwave therapy, which are generally referred to as "bone growth stimulators."
A recent survey of Canadian orthopaedic surgeons showed that 16% of surgeons reported using bone growth stimulators for managing uncomplicated open and closed tibial shaft fractures and 45% used them for complicated tibial shaft fractures. Surgeons reported using low intensity pulsed ultrasound and electrical stimulation with equal frequency (21% each).1
In the linked systematic review (doi:10.1136/bmj.b351), Busse and colleagues assess the effectiveness of low intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone fractures.2 They find that the results are conflicting and that the quality of the evidence base
Rudolf W Poolman, consultant orthopaedic surgeon
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis and Medisch Centrum Jan van Goyen, Postbus 95500, 1090 HM Amsterdam, Netherlands
Poolman@trauma.nl
Read all Rapid Responses