Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 24 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b765
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b765
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
As a practising doctor, I still derive almost childish pleasure in taking some pens or sticky notes for the secretary and an occasional USB stick for myself. If taking these trinkets is believed to influence my prescribing practice, then I am quite offended.1 The integrity of ordinary jobbing doctors is questioned without much hard evidence.
Consider the hospitality stands that various industries have to entertain clients, including government departments. Nearly all are busy lining their own pockets. Of course I do not agree with bribery and corruption, but to say that sponsoring an educational event or occasional dinner or the free gift of a stapler is enough to influence doctors is outrageous. Drug companies present data to suit their products and are biased, but so are all other companies. Just as ordinary people are clever enough to decide for themselves what is good for them, doctors can weigh up data
Anita Damle, consultant psychiatrist1
1 St Andrews Healthcare, Northampton NN1 5DG
pratibhajog@hotmail.com