Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 17 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b642
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b642
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
I am not surprised that the study by Ekeberg and colleagues showed no difference between subacromial ultrasound-guided or systemic steroid injection for rotator cuff disease.1
What is rotator cuff disease? I submit no such disease exists. You might as well talk of shoulder pain disease or the long discredited periarthritis.
The diagnostic criteria seem to be pain on abduction (active or passive or both?), up to 49% reduced glenohumeral motion in one direction only (active or passive limitation, or both?), with pain on two resisted movements, and a positive impingement sign (a painful arc?). What is the basis for deciding that this complicated combination of physical signs correlates with rotator cuff disease?
But if it does, what is the logic of trying to treat it by injecting into the subacromial bursa, a different structure? The rotator cuff consists of the tendons of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, and teres minor muscles
Gabriel Symonds, general practitioner1
1 Tokyo, Japan
symonds@tokyobritishclinic.com