Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 13 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b612
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b612
Zosia Kmietowicz
1 London
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Champions of evidence based medicine have defended the UK governments drugs adviser who was criticised this week by the home secretary for saying that the risk associated with taking the recreational drug ecstasy was no worse than riding a horse.
Ben Goldacre, a doctor and author of Bad Science, said that it was "completely ridiculous" that David Nutt was forced to apologise for his comments, which he made in an article in the Journal of Psychopharmacology and were widely reported in the British press at the weekend (2009;23:3-5, doi:10.1177/0269881108099672).
In the article, which was written before Professor Nutt took his post as chairman of the Council on the Misuse of Drugs, he argued that "equine addiction syndrome" results in 100 deaths a year compared with 30 for ecstasy use.
The home secretary, Jacqui Smith, criticised Professor Nutt and demanded an apology, saying that his comments went beyond
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
Twitter What's this?