Published 13 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b140
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b140

Editorials

Prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome

A range of options that provide reliable and reproducible results is essential

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Screening for Down’s syndrome is the most controversial aspect of antenatal care offered to pregnant women, and it is a highly emotionally charged subject. In a recent editorial, two senior executives of Down Syndrome Education International claimed that current public health policies leading to an estimated annual loss of 400 normal fetuses to prevent the birth of 600 babies with Down’s syndrome were "shocking."¹ Both the estimated numbers and the tone of the statement were disputed by—among others—members of the editorial board of the journal published by Down Syndrome Education International.²

Two BMJ papers provide additional information for the debate. In the first, Ekelund and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.a2547) described real life data from Denmark after the introduction of the first trimester combined screening programme in 2005.³ In the second (doi:10.1136/bmj.b138), Gekas and colleagues calculated the cost effectiveness of 19 different screening algorithms using data generated by computer . . . [Full text of this article]

¹ University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women’s Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

People with disabilities are not equal from the start

Joyce M Carter
BMJ 2009 338: b1497. [Extract] [Full Text]

Tricky thing, choice

Jane Smith
BMJ 2009 338: b707. [Extract] [Full Text]

Comparison of different strategies in prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome: cost effectiveness analysis of computer simulation

Jean Gekas, Geneviève Gagné, Emmanuel Bujold, Daniel Douillard, Jean-Claude Forest, Daniel Reinharz, and François Rousseau
BMJ 2009 338: b138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Impact of a new national screening policy for Down’s syndrome in Denmark: population based cohort study

Charlotte K Ekelund, Finn Stener Jørgensen, Olav Bjørn Petersen, Karin Sundberg, Ann Tabor Danish Fetal Medicine Research Group
BMJ 2008 337: a2547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Skotko, B. G (2009). With new prenatal testing, will babies with Down syndrome slowly disappear?. Arch. Dis. Child. 94: 823-826 [Full text]  
• Carter, J. M (2009). People with disabilities are not equal from the start. BMJ 338: b1497-b1497 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Combined screening

David J Hill
bmj.com, 20 Feb 2009 [Full text]

No plan survives contact with the enemy

Malcolm John Dickson
bmj.com, 4 Mar 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>