Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 10 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.a3049
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a3049
Is as clinically effective as that delivered by doctors, but may cost more
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The multicentre randomised controlled trial by Williams and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.b231) compares the clinical effectiveness of doctors and nurses undertaking upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. The study by Richardson and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.b270) assesses the cost effectiveness of this approach. The studies found no significant difference in clinical outcomes, although doctors seemed to be more cost effective.1 2
Nurse led services in the United Kingdom have been encouraged by government policy, a shortage of doctors, a willingness of nurses to adopt expanded roles, and a salaried NHS workforce where professionals are not in competition for income from patients. Evaluations of substituting doctors with nurses have consistently found little difference in performance. In primary care, no appreciable differences between doctors and nurses have been found in health outcomes for patients, process of care, or use and cost of resources, whereas nurse led care has resulted in higher patient satisfaction.3 These
Christine Norton, professor of gastrointestinal nursing1, Andy Grieve, professor of medical statistics1, Maggie Vance, nurse consultant (gastroenterology)2
1 Kings College London, London SE1 8WA, 2 St Marks Hospital, Harrow HA1 3UJ
Christine.s.norton@kcl.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses