Published 3 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b426
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b426

News

Guideline seeks to clarify difference between palliative sedation and euthanasia

¹ Utrecht

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The Dutch Medical Association has issued new guidance on palliative sedation, acknowledging that the practice, increasing in the Netherlands, is more "unmanageable" than it could have foreseen.

The association accepts that its original 2005 guideline failed to properly address concerns about its possible inappropriate use. Some lay people were especially worried about the deep and continuous sedation of terminally ill patients until death.

Fears were raised among people outside the medical profession that doctors could opt for this to avoid the legal requirements to report euthanasia (BMJ 2007;334:1075, doi:10.1136/bmj.39220.590428.DB).

Marian Verkerk, who chairs the guidelines committee and is professor of medical ethics at Groningen University Medical Centre, accepts that questions still remain, such as what the relation is between palliative sedation and euthanasia, when a symptom is untreatable, and whether consultation with colleagues should be obligatory.

The new guideline is intended to be more comprehensive and explanatory, . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study

Judith Rietjens, Johannes van Delden, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Hilde Buiting, Paul van der Maas, and Agnes van der Heide
BMJ 2008 336: 810-813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Incidence of euthanasia in the Netherlands falls as that of palliative sedation rises

Tony Sheldon
BMJ 2007 334: 1075. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Online poll

Find out more >>