Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 2 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b397
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b397
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
We are concerned about any outsourcing of medical education to pharmaceutical companies.1 Common sense tells us this could only be harmful, and a growing literature suggests contact between healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies leads to irrational prescribing2 3 and to the provision of biased or inaccurate information, with inaccuracies favouring the products of the company.4 5
If we know that most doctors fail to spot misinformation provided by pharmaceutical company employees,4 5 can we expect medical students to fare any better?
Recognising this, US medical schools have commendably started to limit contact between medical students and pharmaceutical companies (www.amsascorecard.org). If budgets do not allow the provision of comprehensive teaching in pharmacology to medical students given by independent academics and clinicians then let us protest loudly rather than resorting to unacceptable alternatives.
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b397
Tom Yates, final year medical student1, Gordon Stewart, professor of experimental medicine1, John S Yudkin, emeritus professor of medicine1, John Yates, emeritus professor of medical genetics2, Alexander Macara, chairman of council, 1993-83
1 University College London Medical School, London WC1E 6BT, 2 University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 3 BMA, London WC1H 9JP
t.yates@ucl.ac.uk
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?