Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 29 April 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1743
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1743
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Improving cosmetic outcome is secondary to achieving thorough tumour excision,1 but new techniques in oncoplastic surgery are making both goals possible.
The oncological superiority of quadrantectomy over lumpectomy has been confirmed by level 1 evidence,2 but cosmetic deformity after quadrantectomy is common and distressing. For this reason, many women facing such extensive resections are advised to undergo mastectomy. But one of the key goals of oncoplastic surgery is to avoid mastectomy by simultaneously reconstructing these large defects. Skin sparing mastectomy is a good example of a procedure which has become standard care, although it has never been compared with conventional skin sacrificing mastectomy in a randomised controlled trial.
Early reports confirm the oncological safety of these techniques.3 The National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit of >10 000 women in England is to be published later this year (www.ic.nhs.uk/mbr).
A strong collaborative partnership between the Association of Breast Surgery
Richard M Rainsbury, consultant oncoplastic breast surgeon1, Fiona MacNeill, consultant oncoplastic surgeon2
1 Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester SO22 5DG, 2 Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ
rrainsbury@aol.com