Published 24 April 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b809
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b809

Editorials

At what age should cervical screening stop?

Negative tests are no reason to stop screening earlier

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Ever since the first organised cervical screening programmes started in Europe more than 40 years ago discussion about the upper age limit for effective screening has been ongoing. The debate is still relevant because mass vaccination of pre-adolescent girls against two or more types of human papillomavirus (HPV) will not affect the incidence of cancer in girls born around the turn of the millennium until 2050-60. In the linked study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b1354), Rebolj and colleagues report that the incidence of cervical cancer is similar in 218 847 women aged 45-54 years and 445 382 women aged 30-44 after their third negative smear.¹

Evidence suggests that repeating smear tests in women aged 60-65 whose previous tests have been normal has little, if any, benefit,² and some researchers have proposed that the age limit should be lowered to 50.^{3 4} In all European programmes, cervical cancer screening stops at a lower age . . . [Full text of this article]

¹ Cervical Screening Oncology Centre, Sahlgren’s University Hospital, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Incidence of cervical cancer after several negative smear results by age 50: prospective observational study

Matejka Rebolj, Marjolein van Ballegooijen, Elsebeth Lynge, Caspar Looman, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Rob Boer, and Dik Habbema
BMJ 2009 338: b1354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Long term risk of invasive cancer after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study

Björn Strander, Agneta Andersson-Ellström, Ian Milsom, and Pär Sparén
BMJ 2007 335: 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rationale for stopping cervical screening in women over 50.

W J Van Wijngaarden and I D Duncan
BMJ 1993 306: 967-971. [Abstract] [PDF]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>