Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 24 April 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1312
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1312
Paul Glasziou, professor of evidence based medicine , Peter Rose, university lecturer , Carl Heneghan, senior clinical research fellow , John Balla, visiting fellow
1 Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF
Correspondence to: P Glasziou paul.glasziou@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Tests of treatment are commonly used when the diagnosis is uncertain, but can have pitfalls. The accompanying article (doi:10.1136/bmj.b1218) gives an example of how test of treatment can be used
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Though ideally we should have a clear diagnosis before starting treatment, such certainty is not always possible. Sometimes this uncertainty can be resolved by using the treatment as the test that confirms the diagnosis.1 For example, if we are unsure if a patients airway obstruction has a reversible element, a trial of steroids can test this: a sufficient response is then considered evidence of reversibility. At other times the test of treatment is not planned, but the failure to respond to treatment as expected leads to a rethink of the diagnosis. In this brief review we discuss different uses of the "test of treatment," its reliability as a diagnostic tool, and how its use might be improved (for a specific example of its use, see the accompanying article on chronic cough2).
As illustrated in figure 1
, a "test of treatment" is one strategy for the final stage of
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses