Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 21 April 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1603
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1603
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
An important alternative to intermittent bladder catheterisation for neurogenic bladder dysfunction is bladder stimulation.1
Suprapubic bladder stimulation was evaluated at Queens Square Hospital, London, in a prospective, but non-randomised, study in 36 patients.2 The device improved the symptoms in 25 patients and reduced the post-voiding residual from a mean of 175 (SD 78) ml to 68 (32) ml. There were no complications and most patients complied well. The authors concluded that suprapubic vibration is an effective means of emptying the neurogenic bladder and that the device may be a useful alternative to clean intermittent self catheterisation. The Queens Square Bladder Stimulator (Malem Medical) was introduced to clinical units and patients in Australia in 1998 on the basis of the trial.
The effect of bladder stimulation can be evaluated in clinical practice using a within patient crossover trial—for example, comparing it with no treatment or intermittent catheterisation, or both, using residual
Martin S Knapp, retired/part time nephrologist1
1 Melbourne, VIC 3079, Australia
knappm@optusnet.com.au