Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 21 April 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1555
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1555
Candace Imison, deputy director of policy, The Kings Fund, Richard W Giordano, senior consultant, Developing Leaders, The Kings Fund
Correspondence to: C Imison c.imison@kingsfund.org.uk
Next week, the BMJ and The Kings Fund will hold a debate asking if doctors have neglected their duty to lead the NHS. Candace Imison and Richard W Giordano describe the importance of doctors as leaders
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
An extensive consultation exercise led by The Kings Fund and the Royal College of Physicians with hundreds of doctors across England last year identified a lack of medical leadership.1
"Theres no easy way to sugar the pill—according to the doctors who took part in this consultation exercise, medical leadership (with a few notable exceptions) was conspicuous by its absence," it said.
These findings seem to be supported by Professor Aidan Halligans (former Director of Clinical Governance for the NHS) reflections on clinical leadership last year. Talking about his work across seven different trusts—which were all dealing with the consequences of a lack of clinical leadership—he said: "In every service, I noticed underlying themes of poor leadership, professional isolation, ineffective systems and processes, disempowerment and poor communication. The underlying team issues included an "everyone knows" culture, active covering up, indecision, a disconnect between management and clinicians and a culture
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses