Published 20 April 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b946
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b946

Practice

Diagnosis in General Practice

Diagnostic strategies used in primary care

¹ Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, ² Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Australia

The strategies used by general practitioners in making a diagnosis are being formally recognised; this article is the first in a series that will illustrate their application, and is accompanied by a case study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b1187)

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

A clinician’s ability to diagnose accurately is central in assessing prognosis and prescribing effective treatments. However, the strategies clinicians use to arrive at a diagnosis, particularly in primary care, make only a small contribution to current research and the medical curriculum.¹ Seminal research in the 1970s showed that the commonly taught sequential approach to history taking and examination, resulting in differential diagnosis and ultimately a final diagnosis, is not what practitioners do in reality.^{2 3} Researchers observed that diagnostic hypotheses are made early in the consultation and guide subsequent history and examination, in a process of hypothetico-deductive reasoning.² This work sparked debate about our understanding of the complex strategies used in diagnostic reasoning,^{4 5} but most work has been done away from the clinical setting.

This series of articles aims to set out the strategies and methods that are used by general practitioners (GPs) in routine clinical consultations. To check that these . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Self diagnosis

Clare Goyder, Ann McPherson, and Paul Glasziou
BMJ 2009 339: b4418. [Extract] [Full Text]

Using probabilistic reasoning

Jenny Doust
BMJ 2009 339: b3823. [Extract] [Full Text]

Critical thinking

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2009 338: b1662. [Extract] [Full Text]

Excluding serious illness in feverish children in primary care: restricted rule-out method for diagnosis

Matthew J Thompson, Anthony Harnden, and Chris Del Mar
BMJ 2009 338: b1187. [Extract] [Full Text]

Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review

Lucas M Bachmann, Esther Kolb, Michael T Koller, Johann Steurer, and Gerben ter Riet
BMJ 2003 326: 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Promoting patient safety in primary care

Tim Wilson, Mike Pringle, and Aziz Sheikh
BMJ 2001 323: 583-584. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research

Jeremy Jones and Duncan Hunter
BMJ 1995 311: 376-380. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Goyder, C., McPherson, A., Glasziou, P. (2009). Self diagnosis. BMJ 339: b4418-b4418 [Full text]  
• Doust, J. (2009). Using probabilistic reasoning. BMJ 339: b3823-b3823 [Full text]  
• Almond, S. C, Summerton, N. (2009). Test of time. BMJ 338: b1878-b1878 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Diagnosis in General Practice

David Brooks
bmj.com, 24 Apr 2009 [Full text]

Strong argument for routine use of a diagnosis checklist

Jason R Maude
bmj.com, 24 Apr 2009 [Full text]

Look before you leap

David M Lewis
bmj.com, 25 Apr 2009 [Full text]

Diagnosis in general practice and secondary care

Huw Llewelyn
bmj.com, 27 Apr 2009 [Full text]

Caution in over reliance on diagnostic checklists

David Ruben
bmj.com, 7 May 2009 [Full text]

Diagnostic strategies in primary healthcare: a simple approach to making a diagnosis

Terry Kemple
bmj.com, 10 May 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>