Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 20 April 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1187
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1187
Matthew J Thompson, senior clinical scientist and general practitioner1, Anthony Harnden, university lecturer1, Chris Del Mar, dean2
1 Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, England, 2 Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Australia
Correspondence to: M J Thompson matthew.thompson@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Two children presenting to general practice with fever show how general practitioners use restricted rule-out, one of the strategies to make a diagnosis set out by Heneghan and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.b946)
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Consider two common scenarios in primary care.
Child 1: A mother calls the out of hours service in the early evening about her 3 year old son. He was seen earlier in the week with cough and runny nose, and the general practitioner (GP) diagnosed an upper respiratory tract infection. He has been getting more miserable and irritable, is lying on the sofa reluctant to move, looks "washed out," and has a fever. His mother is worried: "Could it be meningitis, doctor?"
Child 2: A 2 year old girl is brought to your morning surgery with a history of a fever that started during the night. You have already seen several children this morning with a non-specific but seemingly mild viral illness.
The list of possible diagnoses for febrile children seen in primary care is long. Identifying children who may have a serious illness can be difficult and is at
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses