Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 1 April 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1360
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1360
Clare Dyer
1 BMJ
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Lawyers for the paediatrician David Southall this week accused the General Medical Council of reversing the burden of proof and requiring him to prove his innocence, as he launched a High Court appeal against a finding of serious professional misconduct.
In a four day hearing that began on Tuesday 31 March Dr Southall is appealing against a GMC fitness to practise panels findings of fact, the misconduct ruling, and a decision to strike him off the medical register.
The fitness to practise panel, which had a lay majority, ruled in December 2007 that he had inappropriately accused a mother of murdering her child, kept "special case files" on children that were not sufficiently "signposted" for hospital staff to access, and sent an unsolicited copy of a child protection letter to an unnamed "consultant paediatrician" at the parents local hospital, where the child was not receiving treatment, and without their consent.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?