Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 23 September 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1675
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1675
Nicholas A Christakis, professor of medical sociology, Harvard Medical School, and attending physician, Mt Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts
christak@hcp.med.harvard.edu
Should the healthcare system favour people whose treatment is more likely to also benefit those around them?
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
When illness in one person is treated or prevented, others to whom that person is connected also benefit. Replacing an elderly mans hip or providing better terminal care for a woman improves the health of their spouses. Getting people to lose weight or quit smoking encourages their friends to do likewise. Treating depression in one man makes those around him happier. Vaccinating part of a population benefits everyone.
All these effects are reflections of our embeddedness in vast social networks involving our fellow human beings. The benefits (and costs) of healthcare interventions can ripple through the network, creating additional benefits (and costs) for others both near and far.
But the better connected that people are—the more family and friends they have, and the more central they are in the network—the larger these effects. If we were to replace the hip of a hermit or get him to quit smoking no
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses