Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 10 September 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1592
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1592
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Lines et al are concerned that the strategy of "shrinking the map" to eliminate malaria will lead to inequitable allocation of resources, development of resistance to insecticides and drugs, and inefficient combination of interventions.1 But the sustained malaria control strategy that they suggest as an alterative to elimination campaigns also has these risks.
Malaria transmission has fallen across Africa, as documented in countries such as Kenya,2 Tanzania,3 Mozambique,4 Swaziland,4 South Africa,4 and Guinea Bissau.5 This trend is probably the result of decades of malaria control activities, economic development, urbanisation, improved education, and access to health care. These countries also face the problems of inequitable and uncoordinated coverage of interventions, drug and insecticide resistance, and inappropriate allocation of resources.
The "tipping point" has been reached in many regions of the endemic countries in Africa, where the incidence of malaria has fallen in large communities and made them susceptible to the resurgence
Roly D Gosling, clinical lecturer1, Daniel Chandramohan, reader1
1 Department of Infectious and Tropical Disease, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
roly.gosling@gmail.com