Published 10 September 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1572
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1572

Editorials

Patient confidentiality and consent to publication

Protection for individuals makes it harder for doctors to share information

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In medicine stories about individual people are important. Knowledge emerges from cases and ethical questions are explored through them, which is why medical journals have traditionally published them.

Once doctors just wrote up their cases and sent them to journals and that was it. Now they know that they need to get the patient’s consent before doing so.¹ But sometimes the authors can’t trace the patient to ask for consent, and sometimes they don’t want to ask the patient. This week, Isaacs and colleagues describe the events surrounding a case report that they submitted to the BMJ two years ago.² We declined to publish it because they did not have consent, but they argue that consent would have been difficult to obtain without jeopardising the clinical relationship with the parents, and that the public interest over-rides the need for consent. The case report was published in an Australasian journal,³ and . . . [Full text of this article]

¹ BMJ, London WC1H 9JR

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Simplifying consent for publication of case reports

Robert W Aldridge
BMJ 2008 337: a1878. [Extract] [Full Text]

Editors and authors vexed and confused by consent

Harvey Marcovitch
BMJ 2008 337: a1879. [Extract] [Full Text]

Getting a patient’s consent for publication

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2008 337: a1633. [Extract] [Full Text]

Gaining consent for publication in difficult cases involving children

David Isaacs, H A Kilham, S Jacobe, Monique M Ryan, and Bernadette Tobin
BMJ 2008 337: a1231. [Extract] [Full Text]

Commentary: Consent and confidentiality in publishing—the view of the BMJ’s ethics committee

Ainsley J Newson and Julian Sheather
BMJ 2008 337: a1232. [Extract] [Full Text]

Commentary: Consent to publication—no absolutes

Frank Oberklaid
BMJ 2008 337: a1233. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Aldridge, R. W (2008). Simplifying consent for publication of case reports. BMJ 337: a1878-a1878 [Full text]  
• Marcovitch, H. (2008). Editors and authors vexed and confused by consent. BMJ 337: a1879-a1879 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Editors and authors vexed and confused by consent

Harvey Marcovitch
bmj.com, 12 Sep 2008 [Full text]

Single case patient anonymity, and MSbP?

John P Heptonstall
bmj.com, 14 Sep 2008 [Full text]

Simplifying consent for publication of case reports.

Robert W Aldridge
bmj.com, 23 Sep 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>