Published 9 September 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1623
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1623

Views & Reviews

Personal View

The UK needs an Institute of Medicine

¹ Kent and Medway Primary Care Trust, ² Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, ³ St Thomas’s Hospital, London

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The permanent revolution within the NHS aims to ensure fiscal balance and the provision of patient centred care while maintaining the support of the medical profession. The fiscal and care aspects have received most attention at the expense of engagement with clinicians, and the policy focus has now moved to the "quality of care" at a time when the word deprofessionalisation captures well the current zeitgeist within the medical profession. Professionalism requires a high level of performance, and so improving standards is fundamental to medical practice; now the issue is how to apply this ethic to the delivery of health care itself. The physician’s primary duty to the patient must be held above other loyalties (institutional, specialist or financial), as this ensures the public’s trust in the profession. However, care in the NHS has to be delivered not only to individuals but also to populations, and this consideration, traditionally confined . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Should we use large scale healthcare interventions without clear evidence that benefits outweigh costs and harms? Yes

Bernard Crump
BMJ 2008 336: 1276. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Should we use large scale healthcare interventions without clear evidence that benefits outweigh costs and harms? No

C Seth Landefeld, Kaveh G Shojania, and Andrew D Auerbach
BMJ 2008 336: 1277. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>