Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 4 September 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.39661.694572.59
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1169
Rhona Knight, portfolio GP, Leicester
rk89@le.ac.uk
Nurses should be acknowledged as the true frontline providers of primary care, says Bonnie Sibbald (doi:10.1136/bmj.39661.707083.59), but Rhona Knight says that moving to a purely nurse led service would be a backward step
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Narrow minded? Lacking insight? Having been both a partner and a salaried doctor in a nurse led service, my view is informed by respect for the nurses I have employed, worked with, worked for, mentored, and taught. The roles of general practitioners and nurses—while dynamic—are different and complex. Each needs appropriate, role focused training.
Nurses as effective leaders are not new. Florence Nightingale with her skills in leadership, evidence based health care, and nursing transformed care and saved the lives of many under her influence.1 2 As the NHS passes its 60th birthday, new 21st century Nightingales continue to venture into exciting, uncharted territory in both primary and secondary care. But concepts of nurse led primary care, where the nurse takes the place of a general practitioner as the first point of patient contact and leads the primary health care team,3 4 can restrict patients choice, lack supporting evidence, and raise many
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses