Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 4 September 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.39661.707083.59
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1157
Bonnie Sibbald, professor of health services research, National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester
bonnie.sibbald@manchester.ac.uk
Nurses should be acknowledged as the true frontline providers of primary care, says Bonnie Sibbald, but Rhona Knight (doi:10.1136/bmj.39661.694572.59) says that moving to a purely nurse led service would be a backward step
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Nurses and doctors have overlapping skills which makes it possible for one to substitute for the other within the area of overlap. In primary care this overlap is substantial. Systematic reviews of research indicate that primary care nurses can deliver as high quality care as general practitioners in the areas of preventive health care, routine follow-up of patients with long term conditions, and first contact care for people with minor illness.1 2 Within the range of care studied, no aspects were found in which general practitioners outperformed nurses. Indeed nurse led care tended to be superior in that nurses gave patients more information and patients were more likely to be satisfied.
High satisfaction with nurse led care does not mean that patients inevitably prefer nurses to general practitioners. Patient preferences in most studies are mixed.1 3 Nurses may be favoured when patients see their problems as "minor" or "routine" but doctors are
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses