Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 3 September 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1532
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1532
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recently sanctioned the use of ranibizumab for age related macular degeneration, having originally concluded it would be cost effective only if limited to treating one eye, which could jeopardise functional vision.1 2 The exorbitant price charged by the drugs manufacturer has been overlooked: widespread use could cost over £300m and up to 1% of the NHS budget.3
Bevacizumab is closely related to ranibizumab and likely to have similar clinical efficacy and side effect profiles. Several studies have supported its effectiveness and reported no short term safety concerns.4 It is an internationally recognised treatment for age related macular degeneration, and used worldwide, costing around £100 per injection compared with £761 for ranibizumab.5
NICE cannot consider bevacizumab as it can only assess drugs for their licensed purpose. But why is it not licensed for intraocular use? Roche/Genentech manufactures both drugs and is reluctant to
Andrew C K Lee, clinical lecturer in public health1, John Radford, director of public health2
1 School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, 2 Rotherham Primary Care Trust, Rotherham S66 1YY
andrew.lee@sheffield.ac.uk