Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 3 September 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1234
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1234
Fay Crawford, senior research fellow (hon) senior lecturer
1 University of Edinburgh, Division of Community Health Sciences: GP Section, Edinburgh EH3 8DE
fay.crawford@ed.ac.uk
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Screening people with diabetes for peripheral neuropathy and the presence of peripheral pulses every 15 months forms part of the quality and outcomes framework of the General Medical Services contract.1 Our understanding about the best ways to identify those at risk of foot disease, although not entirely definitive, has been greatly helped by epidemiological research to evaluate the prognostic value of tests.2 Unfortunately, the same progress has not been made with preventive strategies, and uncertainty exists about the best ways to prevent foot ulcers, especially new cases.3
Little evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is available to inform clinical guidelines on preventing diabetic foot ulcers.4 5 6 Naturally, good glycaemic control is highly desirable and has been shown to reduce the incidence of neuropathy.7 However, the effects of interventions that explicitly focus on foot health, specialist foot care, pressure deflection, and patient education have not been rigorously evaluated.
A systematic review of
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?